AH30010
Level 3

Writings on Art

Art History & Cultural PolicyDr Aleksandra Gajowy5 creditsAutumnOn campus

This module is only open to art history majors for whom it is compulsory. This module provides an overview of some of the principal trends in writing on art from the pre-modern to the present day. It thus builds upon the thematic modules undertaken in Levels 1 and 2, enabling students to place their cumulative experience in a methodological framework. The course develops students’ understanding of art history as a discipline while importantly positioning it in dialogue with diverse approaches and methods to underscore the interdisciplinary nature of the field. Topics include formalism, connoisseurship, feminism, queer theory, and decoloniality. The module aims to provide students with a theoretical and critical context for their final-year study of art history and to aid them in identifying the ideas that inform their own approaches to the subject. It attunes students to current and emerging approaches to art history.

No score yet

A score appears after 3 reviews. So far there is 1 — read it below.

Who teaches it

Named by students in their reviews. These ratings cover this module only, and don't count towards its overall score.

  • Aleksandra Gajowy
    Module coordinator

    3.0Mixed teaching1 rating · Spring 2025/26

Reviews(1)

A

Anonymous Student

Apr 14, 2026

Would not recommend
Worth it:Barely worth itInterest:Mixed
Hours:4–6 h/wkDifficulty:Very hard
Aleksandra GajowyTeaching:Mixed

I ended the class in an A, but found that my the grading criteria was unclear and felt inconsistent from peer to peer. The required readings for the week could be better chosen for relevancy and quality for the related weekly art genre. One of the required readings was flawed in its interpretation of a well known piece of Spanish literature which left their argument flawed and awkward for the author's justification and relevance to their own point in their book. A better comparison could have been made for that.

In practice

1 lecture and one student led class presentation a week. Most of your time is working with your group and reviewing feedback and grades of previous groups, which tends to be poor and inconsistent.

Advice

Only take it if it's a core class. Grading is strange, word out for me, nuked most everyone else.

Spring 2025/26